Skip to main content
CleanPowerDaily
Back to Home

In the Trenches: New York Solar Resistance Swells, Data Center Moratoriums Spread Across Four States, and Wind Pushback Reaches Kentucky

7 min read
In the Trenches: New York Solar Resistance Swells, Data Center Moratoriums Spread Across Four States, and Wind Pushback Reaches Kentucky

From rural New York to the fast-growing suburbs of Charlotte, North Carolina, communities across the country spent the week pushing back against energy and infrastructure projects at a pace that underscores the mounting friction between large-scale development and local consent. At least four states saw active efforts to impose moratoriums on data centers alone, while solar farm opposition stretched from the Great Lakes to the South Carolina Lowcountry, and a Kentucky county moved to freeze wind energy development before any turbines are even proposed.

Solar Siting Battles

New York emerged as a flashpoint for solar opposition this week as rural communities across the state organized against 18 planned industrial-scale solar installations. Residents told the New York Post that the state is "strong-arming" the projects into their communities over vocal objections. Opponents argue the facilities would damage agricultural land, harm local wildlife, and deliver minimal energy output relative to their footprint. The growing resistance reflects a broader pattern of rural pushback against state-level renewable energy mandates that override local zoning authority.

Meanwhile in the same state, residents of Ticonderoga turned out to a public hearing at the local high school auditorium to voice concerns about a proposed lithium-ion battery energy storage system. As reported by Sun Community News, the BESS project drew significant community engagement, with residents raising questions about safety risks and siting decisions. The hearing underscored that opposition in New York now spans multiple clean energy technologies, not just solar.

In South Carolina, Berkeley County Council voted 3-2 to lift a large-scale development moratorium that had been blocking the controversial Sandy Run Solar project near Cross. The vote, covered by both the Post and Courier and ABC News 4, sparked tense scenes in council chambers as community members who had fought to maintain the moratorium expressed anger and frustration. The narrow vote split the council and left opponents vowing to continue their fight against the solar installation through other channels.

Wisconsin's Public Service Commission added to the week's solar approvals over local objections, voting to grant a construction certificate for the Fox Solar project in the town of Morgan, about 15 miles southwest of Oconto Falls in Oconto County. According to WTAQ, the project would generate 100 megawatts using more than 208,000 panels. Community members had pushed back against the development, but state regulators moved forward with approval.

Data Center Disputes

Data center opposition continued its rapid spread this week, with communities in at least four states actively pursuing moratoriums or organizing against proposed facilities. The concerns echo a now-familiar litany: strain on water supplies, energy grid impacts, noise, and questions about whether the projects deliver sufficient local economic benefit to justify their footprint.

Charlotte, North Carolina, became the week's most visible battleground. Residents packed a public hearing to demand a 150-day moratorium on new data center development, with the overwhelming majority of speakers opposing further projects, as reported by WFAE. The Charlotte City Council had scheduled the hearing to gauge public sentiment on the proposed pause, according to WUNC, and the turnout left little doubt about where residents stand. The moratorium would give city officials time to study the cumulative impacts of data center growth on infrastructure and quality of life.

In New Mexico, U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez publicly called on Socorro County officials to approve a temporary moratorium on new data centers following controversy over a Canadian company's proposed project. As reported by Source New Mexico, the involvement of a sitting member of Congress signals that data center siting disputes are escalating beyond local politics and into the federal arena.

In Osawatomie, Kansas, residents are pushing for their own moratorium on a proposed data center, arguing the facility would strain local resources. According to KMBC, community members say the project would bring major negative impacts that outweigh any promised economic gains. The organized resistance in a small Kansas city mirrors the dynamics playing out in much larger metro areas like Charlotte.

Frustrations boiled over in Kenilworth, New Jersey, where dozens of residents gathered to protest a proposed AI data center only to have the scheduled meeting called off. As CBS News reported, the cancellation further inflamed opponents who had mobilized to voice their concerns at the public forum. The incident highlighted the tension that arises when community members feel shut out of the decision-making process.

Wind Energy and Mixed-Use Moratoriums

McLean County, Kentucky, took a preemptive step this week, with its Fiscal Court considering a temporary moratorium on wind energy conversion systems. The first reading of the proposed ordinance has already been held, according to the Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer. The move is notable because it appears designed to block wind development before any specific proposals have been submitted, reflecting a trend of communities acting proactively to establish regulatory frameworks — or outright bans — before developers arrive.

In West Michigan, Allendale Township is weighing a broader approach. Township leaders are considering a one-year moratorium that would block not just one type of project but data centers, battery storage facilities, large-scale solar farms, and wind farms simultaneously. As MLive reported, no proposals for any of these project types have actually been submitted in Allendale. Township Supervisor Adam Elenbaas said the pause is intended to give leaders time to research the effects of such developments, particularly groundwater use by data centers. The board of trustees will vote on the measure at its June 8 meeting.

What to Watch

  • Allendale Township, Michigan — June 8: The township board of trustees will vote on a proposed one-year moratorium covering data centers, battery storage, solar farms, and wind projects. The outcome could set a precedent for other West Michigan communities weighing similar blanket pauses on energy infrastructure development. (MLive)
  • Charlotte, North Carolina: Following a packed public hearing where residents overwhelmingly demanded a pause on data center development, the Charlotte City Council is expected to take action on a proposed 150-day moratorium. The council's decision will be closely watched by other fast-growing Sunbelt cities grappling with data center demand. (WFAE)
  • McLean County, Kentucky: Following the first reading of a proposed wind energy moratorium ordinance, the McLean County Fiscal Court is expected to hold a second reading and potential final vote. The outcome will signal whether preemptive moratoriums — enacted before any developer has submitted plans — are gaining traction as a strategy in rural communities. (Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer)

Trends and Takeaways

This week's stories reveal several converging patterns in community opposition to energy and infrastructure development. The moratorium has become the tool of choice for communities across the political and geographic spectrum, with at least six jurisdictions actively pursuing or considering temporary bans on projects ranging from solar farms to data centers to wind turbines. Notably, some of these moratoriums — as in Allendale Township and McLean County — are being enacted preemptively, before any developer has even submitted a proposal, suggesting that national media coverage of siting disputes is prompting communities to act defensively. Data center opposition, which barely registered as a local issue two years ago, now rivals solar and wind pushback in volume and intensity, driven by concerns over water consumption, energy demand, and the perception that these facilities deliver few local jobs relative to their impacts. Across all project types, a common thread persists: residents feel that state-level approvals and developer timelines are outpacing meaningful local input, fueling a sense of disenfranchisement that continues to shape the politics of energy development nationwide.